Food Dye Science

Top 10 Key EFSA and JECFA Assessment Reports on Food Dyes

1. EFSA Re-evaluation of the "Southampton Six" Dyes (2009-2015)

Dyes: Tartrazine (E102), Quinoline Yellow (E104), Sunset Yellow FCF (E110), Ponceau 4R (E124), Allura Red AC (E129), and the pivotal re-evaluation of Carmoisine (E122) and the preservative sodium benzoate.
Why it's Top: This series was a direct response to the controversial 2007 Southampton study linking these dyes (and benzoate) to increased hyperactivity in children. EFSA meticulously reviewed all behavioral studies. While they confirmed the dyes were safe at current exposure levels for most, they found the evidence for behavioral effects inconclusive but could not rule it out. This led to the EU mandatory warning label: "may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children" on any food containing any of these six dyes.

2. JECFA Evaluation of Allura Red AC (2011)

Dye: Allura Red AC (FD&C Red No. 40, E129).
Why it's Top: This international assessment is the basis for its global ADI. JECFA reviewed extensive data, including controversial carcinogenicity studies. They concluded there was no evidence of carcinogenicity or genotoxicity and reaffirmed the ADI. This opinion is constantly cited in debates about the safety of this most widely used red dye.

3. EFSA Re-evaluation of Sunset Yellow FCF (2014)

Dye: Sunset Yellow FCF (FD&C Yellow No. 6, E110).
Why it's Top: This was a massive review of over 200 studies. EFSA significantly lowered the ADI from 2.5 mg/kg bw/day to 1 mg/kg bw/day based on new toxicological data, particularly effects on the kidney and adrenal gland in animal studies. This demonstrated the evolving nature of safety assessments with new science.

4. EFSA Opinion on the potential association between Tartrazine and hyperactivity (2009)

Dye: Tartrazine (FD&C Yellow No. 5, E102).
Why it's Top: Tartrazine is one of the oldest and most studied dyes, often linked to intolerance reactions. This focused opinion on behavior was a key component of the Southampton Six review. EFSA's conclusion that a causal link to hyperactivity was not established but that a small effect in sensitive children could not be discounted was highly influential.

5. JECFA Monograph on Erythrosine (1990, with later evaluations)

Dye: Erythrosine (FD&C Red No. 3, E127).
Why it's Top: Erythrosine has a long, controversial history due to thyroid effects in animal studies. JECFA's evaluations have been critical in navigating this. They established an ADI while noting the effects were species-specific and likely not relevant to humans at approved doses. It remains banned in the EU for food but is permitted in the US (with restrictions) and by JECFA—a prime example of different regulatory interpretations of the same studies.

6. EFSA Re-evaluation of Caramel Colours (I, II, III, IV) (2011)

Additive: Caramel colours (E150a-d).
Why it's Top: Caramel colours are the most consumed food coloring by weight globally. EFSA's review was monumental, distinguishing between the four types made by different processes. They focused on 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), a byproduct in some classes (E150c, d) that was a carcinogen in rodent studies. EFSA set strict maximum limits for 4-MEI in the final product, leading to industry-wide reformulation.

7. EFSA Safety assessment of Titanium Dioxide (E171) as a food additive (2021)

Additive: Titanium Dioxide (E171).
Why it's Top: While a pigment, not a dye, its use as a whitener is analogous. This opinion was a landmark. After reviewing new evidence on nanoparticles, EFSA concluded E171 could no longer be considered safe as a food additive due to concerns about genotoxicity (potential to damage DNA). This led to an EU-wide ban in 2022, showcasing a major regulatory shift based on emerging nanomaterial science.

8. JECFA Evaluation of Brilliant Blue FCF (2015)

Dye: Brilliant Blue FCF (FD&C Blue No. 1, E133).
Why it's Top: Brilliant Blue is generally considered one of the safest and most well-tolerated synthetic dyes. JECFA's evaluation, which reaffirmed its safety and ADI, is notable because it reviewed and dismissed long-standing but poorly substantiated claims about serious neurological and allergic reactions, solidifying its safety profile.

9. EFSA Re-evaluation of Indigotine / Indigo Carmine (2014)

Dye: Indigotine (FD&C Blue No. 2, E132).
Why it's Top: This assessment highlighted how different bodies can interpret the same data. EFSA reviewed a key rat study and concluded there were uncertainties, leading them to recommend a temporary ADI and call for new data. This contrasts with JECFA and the FDA's more conclusive ADIs, illustrating the "precautionary principle" often applied in the EU.

10. JECFA Evaluation of Natural Colorants: Annatto extracts (2006, 2018)

I'm late for work again